Tech Journal · #25

micro-coaxial

How to Write a Cable Assembly RFQ That Gets Quoted Right the First Time

EDPcable Engineering Team2026-07-02
How to Write a Cable Assembly RFQ That Gets Quoted Right the First Time
ARTICLE · #252026-07-02

Summary

When a cable assembly quote drags through round after round, the supplier usually isn't slow — the RFQ is just missing the few details that let anyone scope the build. An RFQ that can be quoted accurately on the first pass needs to spell out a handful of dimensions: a drawing or an old sample, full connector part numbers and pinout, length and routing, shielding, impedance and test requirements, the operating environment, quantities by phase, and any certification or documentation. This article walks through what each one should contain, shows how a few common gaps trigger predictable follow-up questions, gives you a copy-and-paste input checklist, and explains how to feed information in stages when you don't have it all yet — so the other side can still quote something. It's a practical guide written for the buyer.

When a Quote Drags, the RFQ Is Usually the Reason

A lot of custom cable assembly inquiries stop at "we need a batch of 30-pin cables, please send a quote." That one line tells the other side roughly what you want, but it isn't enough to price. What follows is a string of follow-ups: which connector? how long? shielded or not? how many? A few email rounds later, a week is gone and the build still isn't defined.

The problem isn't that anyone is slow to reply — it's that the first RFQ didn't deliver, in one shot, the information needed to scope the job. A cable assembly is configured to order: connector, wire, termination and test each move both the price and the lead time. The more specific the RFQ, the more accurately the other side can quote on the first pass, and the fewer rounds it takes. Below is what a complete RFQ should carry, followed by the follow-ups a few common gaps tend to trigger.

What a Complete RFQ Should Include

Think of it as a checklist for stating the requirement once. You don't have to fill every line, but each blank is a possible extra round. Broken out by dimension, it comes down to a few blocks:

  • A drawing or an old sample. An assembly drawing is ideal; failing that, the physical reference part or clear photos can still pin down both interfaces and the rough structure. This is the single biggest round-saver.
  • Full connector part numbers + pin definition / pinout. Both ends, with the suffix — not just the series name — plus a pin-to-pin definition that says which pin goes where. For how the codes read and why the suffix matters, see "How to Read Connector Part Numbers."
  • Length and routing / bend. Give the overall finished length and tolerance; if there are branches, a set bend, or it has to fit a specific space, include the routing and the minimum bend radius.
  • Shielding / impedance / test requirements. Whether it needs shielding, single-ended or differential, the target impedance (such as 90Ω / 100Ω), whether continuity and hipot testing are required, and any signal-integrity targets. For high-speed assemblies, this block drives the wire selection directly.
  • Operating environment. Temperature range, whether there's continuous vibration or repeated flexing, and whether it contacts fluids or needs cleaning and disinfection. The environment decides the jacket and the termination process.
  • Quantities and phases. How many at sample, pilot and production, and roughly when. Pricing tiers with volume, so the phases have to be clear before the matching prices can come back in one go.
  • Certification or documentation requirements. Which compliance points apply (such as RoHS / REACH), whether UL-recognized wire is needed, whether a medical build involves the relevant documentation, and whether you need a first-article inspection report or material certificates.

Skip These, and You Usually Buy Another Round

You don't need the whole list from memory, but a few items almost always trigger a follow-up if they're missing, so they're worth getting in first:

  1. A connector series name with no full part number or mating end. Within one series, latched versus unlatched and thicker versus thinner plating can differ; the other side can't confirm which one to mate to and has to ask back — and at the sample stage it can easily fail to fit the equipment.
  2. A length with no routing or environment. The same 200mm cable run free versus shaped to fit a tight space is two builds and two prices. Environment is the same — room-temperature static versus continuous vibration calls for entirely different wire and termination, and leaving it out means re-estimating.
  3. No quantity or phase. Quote a single quantity and the other side will tool and test for it by default; add volume later at production and the tooling and unit price may both need recalculating. Flagging the staged estimates up front avoids re-pricing when you scale.

What these share: without them, a quote can only rest on assumptions — and assumptions come back for confirmation sooner or later, which is one more round.

A Copy-and-Paste Input Checklist

Fill in the table below and you've covered most of what it takes to quote accurately on the first pass. Where you can't, write "TBD" or give a range — still better than a blank, since it lets the other side judge which tier to quote first.

DimensionWhat to provideIf you don't have it
StructureAssembly drawing / reference part / photoDescribe both interfaces + rough structure in words
Connectors (both ends)Full part number (with suffix) + mating endSeries name + photo of the part or the board header
PinoutPin-to-pin definitionMark the key pins (power / ground / differential pairs)
LengthOverall finished length + toleranceGive a length range
Routing / bendBranches, set bend, minimum bend radiusDescribe the space or equipment it fits into
Shielding / impedanceShielded or not, target impedance, diff/single-endedDescribe the signal type and rate
TestContinuity, hipot, signal-integrity targetsDescribe the matching application
EnvironmentTemperature, vibration, flexing, fluids / cleaningDescribe how the equipment is used
Quantity / phaseSample / pilot / production quantities and timingGive an order-of-magnitude range
Certification / docsRoHS/REACH, UL wire, inspection reports, etc.Describe the end market and industry

When You Don't Have Everything, Feed It in Stages

You don't have to wait until every document is in hand before sending an RFQ. Early in a project the drawing often isn't out and the production quantity isn't set yet — that's normal. The smoother approach is to work in two steps.

First, send what's already locked — connectors for both ends, an approximate length, the expected phases and quantities — and attach the reference part or photos. That's enough for the other side to give a directional quote and a list of things to clarify, and enough for you to judge whether this supplier is the right fit.

Second, before the sample or pilot run, fill in the drawing, the full pinout, and the test and certification details to lock the price and the tooling. Separating "ask for direction first, settle the details later" is actually faster than waiting to send it all at once — and it surfaces, early, the parts of the requirement that weren't fully thought through.

If what you have is a complete custom project, from scoping the requirement through to prototyping, go straight to the custom cable assembly inquiry and attach the checklist above — it cuts out most of the back-and-forth.

FAQ04

Frequently asked questions

  • Can I send an RFQ before I have everything?

    Yes — and it's usually the better move. Spell out the connectors, length, quantity and phase you've already locked, and mark anything undecided as "TBD" or give a range. The other side can typically come back with a directional quote and a list of items to clarify. Trading partial information back and forth tends to be faster than waiting until every detail is settled.

  • Is a connector series name ("a DF14 cable") enough to get a quote?

    It's enough to start the conversation, but an accurate quote usually needs the full suffix, the mating end, the pin count and the pinout. Different suffixes in the same series can mean different latches or platings, and quoting on the series name alone often leads to rework at the sample stage. See "How to Read Connector Part Numbers" for how the codes break down.

  • What if I don't have a drawing?

    A reference part or clear photos work in its place, paired with the connector details for both ends and an approximate length. Projects often need a price early, before any formal drawing exists; sending the physical part plus key dimensions is more practical than waiting on a drawing, which you can supply before the pilot run.

  • Do I have to state sample, pilot and production needs all at once?

    It helps to flag the expected quantity and timing for each phase right in the RFQ. Price moves with volume, so calling out the phases up front lets the other side return tiered pricing along with the matching tooling and test plan — and saves you from re-pricing once you reach production.

Last updated: 2026-07-02
SEC · 03Related applications

Related applications

SEC · 02Related Articles

Related Articles

I-PEX, Hirose and JAE Fine-Pitch Connectors: An Interface and Mating Map
POST · 012026-06-22

EDPcable Engineering Team

I-PEX, Hirose and JAE Fine-Pitch Connectors: An Interface and Mating Map

On high-density display and micro-coaxial work, the connector interface almost always circles back to three Japanese houses — I-PEX, Hirose and JAE — and each one carries a long list of series, so just keeping the part numbers straight is a chore. This article ranks nobody. It lays the three interface families side by side on one table — by positioning, pitch range, wire-to-board vs. coaxial emphasis, and typical application — and then clears up the most misread idea in the field: what "mating-compatible" or an "equivalent direction" actually means (the U.FL / MHF pairing being the classic case). One line of intent: suffixes and mating are always settled by the original manufacturer's catalog and your own drawing — this piece only hands you an interface map to navigate selection.

Read More: I-PEX, Hirose and JAE Fine-Pitch Connectors: An Interface and Mating Map
Reading Connector Part Numbers: What I-PEX, Hirose and JAE Suffixes Are Telling You
POST · 022026-06-18

EDPcable Engineering Team

Reading Connector Part Numbers: What I-PEX, Hirose and JAE Suffixes Are Telling You

One series name, a single different letter at the end, and you can end up with a connector that has a different latch, a different plating, or isn't even the same wire-side or board-side part. A connector part number encodes all of those differences into one string of characters. This article breaks the part number into its segments — series, pin count, pitch, mating direction, latch, plating, packaging and revision suffix — and gives a reading framework for three common families: I-PEX, Hirose DF and JAE FI. It points to where the suffix most often costs you, and explains which pieces of the part number to spell out the first time you ask for a quote. It's a how-to primer, not a substitute for the manufacturer's catalog.

Read More: Reading Connector Part Numbers: What I-PEX, Hirose and JAE Suffixes Are Telling You
Micro-Coax vs. FFC for Slim Devices: Six Trade-offs That Decide It
POST · 032026-06-08

EDPcable Engineering Team

Micro-Coax vs. FFC for Slim Devices: Six Trade-offs That Decide It

When a camera module, display or antenna sits a dozen centimeters from the main board inside a thin enclosure, two interconnects compete for the job: flat flexible cable (FFC) and micro-coaxial bundles. FFC wins on cost and on sliding into stacked, flat spaces; micro-coax wins on EMI behavior, 3D routing freedom and dynamic flexing, because every conductor carries its own shield and the bundle bends in any direction. This article compares the two across signal integrity, shielding, bend life, space shape, connector ecosystem and cost, then describes the hybrid layouts — coax for the antenna and camera lines, FFC for power and low-speed control — that many real devices end up with.

Read More: Micro-Coax vs. FFC for Slim Devices: Six Trade-offs That Decide It